Tony
Bush (2011) in his book “Theories of Educational Leadership and Management”
studies different models of organizational structure. This topic is relevant
for everyone who deals with any type of organization since the concepts discussed
in the book are applicable to any organization. In this essay, I will consider
formal, collegial, and political models and their common features.
Formal
models are the most common models for organizations all over the world. Formal models represent different theories,
which include structural models, systems models, bureaucratic models, rational
models and hierarchical models. They all have clear organizational structure and
in most cases this structure is hierarchical. Education institutions which
possess on of these models are goal-seeking institutions; in the
decision-making there is a strong rational process; and there is a presence of
authority and accountability. Systems models to addition to the key features
have coherence that is described as “unity and integrity of the organization
inside and outside” (Bush, 2011, p. 44). “Bureaucratic models seek maximum
efficiency through rational approaches to management” (Bush, 2011, p. 47). In
addition to key features of all formal models, bureaucratic models constitute distribution
of proxies, impersonal relationships, reward for the carried work, and strong
control on rules and regulations. The focus of rational models is in
decision-making with the implementation of normative theories, which give the
notion of norms of behavior within organization. Hierarchical models focused on
the accountability to external environment.
“Collegial
models assume that organizations determine policy and make decisions through a
process of discussion leading to consensus” (Bush, 2011, p. 72). Collegial
models have two main branches: restricted collegiality that is described by
decision-making of limited number of participants and pure collegiality, which
gives the opportunity to everyone to participate in decision-making process.
The key features of collegial models differ from formal ones. Collegial models
are described as normative where “decisions are made on an individual basis
rather than standardized” (Bush, 2011, p. 74). Collegial models have to have
same vision to make right decisions and “making groups is an important element
in collegial management” (Bush, 2011, p. 74).
Political
models refer to “micropolitics” (Bush, 2011, p. 99). Its major features are
group activity, the existence of interests and interest groups, presence of
conflicts, the process of bargaining and negotiation in decision-making and
power of individuals or groups.
To
sum up, formal and collegial models have static structure whereas political
models’ structure is not stable. Formal models designed for effectiveness of
organizations’ decisions, while political models’ structure identifies “which
interests are to be served by the organization” (Bush, 2011, p. 114).
References
Bush, T. (2011).
Theories of educational leadership and
management. (4th ed.) Nottingham, UK: SAGE Publications ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment