Prominent
author, Fullan (1999) argues that, even though teachers may resist change, they
should be listened to, as resisters might have some valuable ideas to offer. Students also can reject new ideas that come
from teacher. Therefore, following Fullan’s line of the argument, Levin (2000)
argues that commitment and participation of students should not be discarded on
the following reasons.
First of
all, students can provide teachers, principals and policy-makers with valuable information
on how school processes could be improved. Rudduck et al. (1996) suggests that
any initiatives should start with finding out the factors that negatively
impact student engagement and motivation or, vice versa, issues that interest
them the most. Students' feedback can be used to monitor the progress of any
reform. For instance, one of the students in my research pointed out that
12-year education reform is ‘meaningless’ and ‘demotivating’. Student
participants provided a sufficient number of reasons to support their opinion. According to the mentioned authors, students’ answers
can be a valuable source of rich data.
Secondly, students' perceptions have a direct influence on their parents' views and even decisions. Otherwise, as it became evident during my interviews, they can become barriers
on the way to change. For instance, at school where I conducted my research, vice
principal informed, that some parents preferred to transfer their children to a
normal 11-year program class, because they did not fully understand the purpose
of the reform. As a result they were just 11 students left in the class.
To sum up, students’ opinion and feedback can become
a powerful tool that can help to increase their commitment, improve school’s
processes and spread ideas to the broader community. As this topic was not widely
researched, it can be assumed that there could be other advantages, as well as
disadvantages of students’ involvement.
Reference
Fullan, M. (1999). Change
forces: The sequel. Psychology
Press.
Levin, B. (2000).
Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of
Educational Change, 1(2), 155-172.
Rudduck,
J., Chaplain, R. & Wallace, G. (eds) (1996). School Improvement: What Can
Pupils Tell Us? London:
David Fulton.
No comments:
Post a Comment