Professoriate
in today’s higher education landscape
One of the main and essential constituencies of the
higher education institutions is the faculty. They are those who drive the
students and university itself to achieve the primary goal of higher education
(to convey and generate knowledge, research and service), to bring outstanding
results and serve to the needs of society. Without highly trained and qualified
professors the university can not achieve any success (Altbach, 2010). Without
qualified and committed academic staff the size of the library, the contemporary
equipments of laboratories will not play a role in producing talented
professionals. Thus, first, I will focus on the role of professoriate and then
I will discuss current challenges that they face.
Image
credit: http://philanthropy.ru/blogs/2015/02/06/20349/
Altbach (2010) points out that higher education concentrates on such
values as “hardware” which deals with the infrastructure (buildings,
laboratories, libraries) and “software” which are humans contributing to the
development of higher education institutions (faculty, administrative staff,
trustees, etc.). Thus, faculty has a unique responsibility and opportunity to
be the flagship of higher education landscape due to the intensive nature of
their work.
The faculty is a “principal academic
source” of any university (Duderstadt, 2000, p. 149). The role of the
professorate in universities is significantly important. According to
Duderstadt (2000), the commitment of professors defines “the excellence of the
academic programs, the quality of student body, the excellence of its teaching
and scholarship, its capacity to serve the broader society” (p. 149).
Although many
people tend to think that the faculty is a homogeneous group of people, sharing
the same activities and having the same problems, there is a vast range of
distinctions among them (Altbach, Reisberg & Rumbley, 2010; Altbach, 2010).
For instance, faculty teaches students of the undergraduate, graduate,
professional levels; they use own ways and approaches to provide knowledge;
some of them simultaneously conduct research; some of them accomplish
administrative assignments as well.
It is undeniable that
academic staff faces various challenges that may undermine the desire to work
as a professor in higher education institutions. They are can be numerous but I
will focus on the following: inadequate financial support, bureaucratization
and qualifications.
It is not a secret that
the salaries of faculty are not more than average salary in a country. The
financial support is really a problem number 1 which makes working in
universities less desirable job. Therefore, there is a trend that faculty
leaves their academic work. Especially, highly trained and well-qualified
professors are discouraged to work due to the overwhelmed volume of workload:
along with teaching academic disciplines and advancing their approaches in
teaching they accomplish administrative tasks, conduct research, and do
paper-work constantly. However, compensation (salary) for their
intensive work is inappropriate.
Bureaucratization also can
be a hurdle in the work of faculty. The academic staff also deals with the
paperwork which takes a lot of time and efforts as well. Sometimes an increased
accountability for external bodies resembles the bureaucratic control over
faculty which influences negatively to their involvement in governing the
university.
Another problem for
faculty is connected with qualifications. Altbach (2010) indicates that “in
most developing countries, only academic staff at the most prestigious
universities hold a doctoral degree – usually under 10 % of the total” (p. 87).
The reason for that is “qualified academics are not being produced fast enough
to meet the demand” (p. 88).
To sum up, we see that the role
of faculty is really significant and to solve above mentioned problems we
should take some measures – to provide appropriate salaries and support, and
increase the status of the professors.
References:
Altbach,
Ph.G. (2011). Harsh Realities: The Professoriate in the Twenty-First
Century. In Ph.G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, & L. Rumbley
(Eds.), American
Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century (pp.227-253). USA :
UNESCO
Publishing.
Duderstadt, J.J. (2000). The Academy. A University for the 21st Century
(pp.147-164). United
States of America :
The University of Michigan Press.
Zere, great topic (no, I'm not just saying that because I'm a faculty member)! Strong overall organization, although I would avoid using "will be explored" as your main thesis statement. Try a more active voice construction. Also, I find the font (bold and italics) to be a bit confusing, like you want all your words to be emphasized and stressed. If you emphasize everything, essentially it loses its meaning.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback, I changed passive voice to active one. But, the font does not want to change. I replaced italics. However, the bold font is always remain same, whether I try to change it.
Delete