Friday, April 24, 2015

Democratic schools - a new revolution in education?

Image source: http://startl.org/blog/2012/07/16/supporting-the-education-revolution/
“All the time you are in school, you learn through experience how to live in a dictatorship.”  
Grace Llewellyn
In continuation of my previous post about academic freedom, I would like to write about the freedom of students to choose what they want to learn. We have to admit that students do not study efficiently at schools which can in fact be associated with “aquariums”, where everybody is fed with the same “seeds” of knowledge. Probably, it is better to put students in the open ocean of knowledge and let them find their own flow which will finally lead them to their future profession. Instead of controlling the process of knowledge acquisition, teachers may provide students with some necessary “tools” and observe them learning what they are really interested in and create the environment of democratic education.
First, it is important to understand what the democratic education is. Democratic education is “education where students are actually empowered to make decisions about their own education and if they are in their own school”(Ricci and Hill, 2007, p. 63). One of such models of education in school was created by a junior student who was simply bored and unhappy at his ordinary school and decided to change something in this system. Thus, he was able to initiate  “The Independent project”, where a small group of High school students became their own teachers: they designed their own curriculum, guided each other through the process of learning, decided how to better present their projects to peers. Real teachers at the same time were given the roles of advisors, but the whole responsibility for learning was given to students themselves.
Image source: http://www.wanderrgirl.com/2013/02/the-independent-project-rethinking-education-reform/
You may wonder then what these students could learn by themselves, since most of them could simply procrastinate and do nothing. But these students were at more advantageous position than all other students at ordinary school: they learned what they truly wanted to learn and thus were really passionate about their interests. Moreover, they realized the responsibility to defend their ideas in front of their peers and get valuable feedback on their achievements (you can watch this video to be better convinced). It is not the same as you learn something merely for grades and then forget it. They were driven by their interests and thus contributed much of their efforts and passion to completing these projects.
The most incredible about this idea of creating democratic education at schools was that students were finally given freedom of choice, speech and ideas. As Agatha Christie once noted: “I suppose it is because nearly all children go to school nowadays, and have things arranged for them, that they seem so forlornly unable to produce their own ideas.” Well, I believe it is true. Students assigned to the Independent project were given a chance to express their ideas, defend them and understand other notions. They could already perceive themselves as independent adults who are responsible for their own future. Nevertheless, I admit that this type of education is probably more suitable for High school. However, children from Sudbury Valley schools wouldn’t agree with me on that. (If you want, you can learn more about another incredible school where students of all ages are given almost absolute freedom in their learning).  
To conclude, democratic school is a new approach of looking at education of students. Even though it is hard to believe that students can organize their own studying process, this type of education has to be analyzed more deeply. I believe that this approach of education cannot only motivate students to learn, but also help them to determine their interests and be better prepared for the choice of the future profession. And I would like to finish this post by an interesting quote of Buckminster Fuller: “None of the world's problems will have a solution until the world's individuals become thoroughly self-educated”. I couldn't agree more!

References:
Ricci, C., & Hill, L. (2007). Apprenticeships: When schooling means more than doing.  Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 66 - 78

4 comments:

  1. Dear Lyudmila,
    Thank you for introducing this new approach of democratic school. It is amazing to read alternative system of schooling. Fresh ideas are good. I do not know how it is to study at democratic school, but I know it is important to study what you really like. From my point of view this approach has to be implemented as elective courses in Universities. I am not sure that it is appropriate to give full freedom to decide what to study in schools. The first reason is that students are children, they need guiding at the beginning of their learning. The second reason is that some “hard” classes will be dropped by majority. As a result labor market may suffer a lot. However, to give responsibility for children in decision making process will build strong ability to answer for the decisions they made.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lyuda, it is so interesting! I’ve seen the video and I think that these students who involved in the Independent Project are really enthusiastic! They go to school not to sleep and get grades (how it usually happens in general schools), but to ask real questions and get real feedback! The fact that they themselves lead sessions and prepare for them allows students to look at problems deeply as teachers usually do. However, I have a question: how are they graded? I mean, in the end of the semester. In the end of the school?) Because they try to break the system, but can they really go out of it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The schools where students have freedom to decide what to learn are good. Students in such schools are more motivated to study than in schools where they are taught according to standardized curricula. These so-called “democratic schools” are usual in foreign countries but not in Kazakhstan. In our country, students did not have experience of developing curriculum. They have never been given opportunity to choose disciplines to study. However, it could be implemented. It would be beneficial if curriculum consisted of two parts: compulsory disciplines that would be chosen by curriculum developers according to standardized plans, and electives chosen by students. It would be good stimuli and make them be interested in studying.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lyudmila, your post is an interesting topic for discussion. Democratic schools, freedom of choice and thinks you like. Personally I observe this idea as not sustainable. The process of learning is a hard process and teacher's mastery makes it easier. People are lazy by their nature and if we give freedom to them they will stop act, do only things they like, in particular, nothing. At the same time, I perceive a freedom at childhood as a disaster. The school is made to form, educate, prepare student for social life. Children are not adults and they are not independent. I am not sure that Sudbury-type schools prepare children for society, which lives on the Earth. Anyway, great topic, interesting data. Thank you for writing!

    ReplyDelete